Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's overall score of 79. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a noticeably newer and extremely thinner cellphone than Xperia XZ2 Compact, although it's notably heavier. The iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Xperia XZ2 Compact works with Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a greater hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a bit better looking screen than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a much smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better display density.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 400 GB. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.