Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-04-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting an 80.2 score against 79. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel is older than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's body is way thinner and somewhat lighter. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little better processing power than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has more CPU cores.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a more vivid display than Google Pixel, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a just a bit higher display pixels density and a quite better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same sensor size, a F2 aperture and the same video quality, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has faster video frame rates and a way better 19 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 400 GB. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 2870mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.