Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a general score of 82.7 against 79. LG G8X ThinQ's design is newer and incredibly thinner than Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has an older 10 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density. LG G8X ThinQ has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a way more MP camera in the back.
LG G8X ThinQ has a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.