Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is a bit better than LG K52, having a score of 79 against 76. Although the Xperia XZ2 Compact is way older and much thicker than LG K52, it's construction is still just a little lighter. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and LG K52 has Android 10, so it gives some additional features.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a way better display than LG K52, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen density and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG K52. Both have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a slightly better camera than LG K52, because although it has a tinier aperture, a camera with much less megapixels resolution and a tinier sensor taking worse quality images, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. The LG K52 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG K52 also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K52 has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.