Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, having an 87.6 score against 79. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is notably heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's notably thinner and newer. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixel density. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has a way better battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact captures just a bit better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, a lot smaller camera sensor which offers a much worse image and video quality, a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and videos in poorly lited situations and a way worse (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.