Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a overall score of 87.1 against 79. The LG Velvet is a extremely newer and a lot thinner phone than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, although it's just a bit heavier. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a brighter screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Velvet, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The LG Velvet features a bit better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
LG Velvet counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.