Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a score of 83.4 against 79. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Motorola Edge 40 Pro is heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's a lot thinner and extremely newer.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has way less brightness, a really smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro captures a lot better photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a way better 50 megapixels resolution back camera, a much better video definition, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.