Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a overall score of 81.9 against 79. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's thinner and extremely newer.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a little lower pixels number in each display inch, it also counts with a larger screen, a really brighter display and a higher 1256 x 2760 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot more megapixels back camera, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.