Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a general score of 86.3 against 79. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the older 14 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's a lot thinner and newer.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a really brighter display, a lot bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a way bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.