Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 global score. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is much newer and thinner than Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better looking display than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a much bigger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and much more brightness. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a way bigger camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.