Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G has an overall score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 score. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G200 5G has the previous 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Moto G200 5G construction is newer and extremely thinner, but heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact.
Moto G200 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a brighter screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 400 GB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a superior camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.