Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-04-05 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ2 Compact has an overall score of 79, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia XZ2 Compact has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version, so it gives you some extra features. Although Xperia XZ2 Compact is newer than the Moto Z Force, it is way thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Force, although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, a just a bit lower screen pixels density and a little smaller screen. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a larger number of cores.
Moto Z Force counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a little bit better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, a camera in the back with a worse resolution and a worse (4K) video quality.
Moto Z Force features better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.