Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision has a score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's score of 79. The Motorola One Vision design is newer and thinner, but a little bit heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a more vivid screen than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Vision. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Motorola One Vision takes slightly better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos, a camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
The Motorola One Vision has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory. The Motorola One Vision has greater battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 22% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.