Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, having an 87 score against 79. Although Motorola razr (2020) is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's noticeably thinner and also noticeably newer. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels count per display inch and a slightly higher 1080 x 2160px resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) features a little bit better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a much higher resolution back camera, a larger camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a larger aperture.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a better memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 2870mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.