Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 15 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | LTPO |
| 483 pixels per inch | -- |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, having a 79.2 score against 79. These phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has 15 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s construction is notably newer and noticeably thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is somewhat heavier.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a much smaller display and a lot more opaque screen.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a larger aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations, a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.