Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Polar night |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a general score of 80.5, which is a little bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 global score. Nokia 8.3 5G's body is noticeably newer and much thinner than Xperia XZ2 Compact's, although it's noticeably heavier. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia 8.3 5G has the older 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit better hardware performance than Nokia 8.3 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a better screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact takes slightly better pictures and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, a lower video quality and a way less mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has much more storage to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia 8.3 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 57 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.