Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-12-03 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A13 5G has a global score of 82.1, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's score of 79. The Galaxy A13 5G body is noticeably newer and extremely thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is also heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A13 5G has the previous 12 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A13 5G. Both have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a much higher display density.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy A13 5G features a very superior battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.