Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting an 84.6 score against 79. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G construction is a lot newer and noticeably thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has older 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A22 5G has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A22 5G. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy A22 5G has a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74 percent larger battery size. Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.