Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a 79.9 score against 79. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A25 5G has the older 14 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the Galaxy A25 5G is somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's much thinner and also incredibly newer.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, a way smaller display and much worse brightness, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a way better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little bit better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller sensor taking lower quality pictures, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a larger aperture and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.