Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a global score of 86.6 against 79. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a newer phone, and it's also noticeably thinner and a bit lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Compact. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
Galaxy A50s has just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a F2 camera aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a larger sensor and a much higher resolution back facing camera. Galaxy A50s has much more storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50s features a really longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.