Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 overall score. Galaxy A52 5G's construction is notably newer and way thinner than Xperia XZ2 Compact's, although it's somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures better photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a way larger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.