Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, having a 91.1 score against 79. Galaxy A52s's body is incredibly newer and much thinner than Xperia XZ2 Compact's, although it is heavier. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52s, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A52s shoots much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos, a lot larger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution.
Galaxy A52s has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a superior battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.