Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an overall score of 92.9, which is much better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's global score of 79. These phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's extremely thinner and also notably newer.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a better display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW captures better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.