Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has a general score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 score. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy F23 has older 12 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy F23's body is notably newer, extremely lighter and much thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F23. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 400 GB. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower 19 megapixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures in low-light environments.
The Galaxy F23 counts with a way better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.