Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a score of 88.1 against 79. The Galaxy F62 is a a lot newer and noticeably thinner device than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, but it's also a lot heavier. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with more cores. Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a much smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density and much more brightness.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a superior camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations, a back facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Galaxy F62 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 144 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.