Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 483 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M51 has a score of 87.7, which is better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 score. Galaxy M51's body is noticeably newer and a lot thinner, but also noticeably heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M51 has the previous 10 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a better looking display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a bigger aperture and a lot better resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy M51 counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.