Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 3 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 general score. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Galaxy Note 3's construction has the same weight than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, but it's extremely thinner.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster). Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy Note 3 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3200mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a lot larger sensor, a bigger aperture, better video frame rate and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.