Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a overall score of 93.6 against 79. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is newer and a lot thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a little worse display density, a really smaller screen and a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little faster CPU than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a way better battery duration than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.