Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 score. The Galaxy S10e design is newer, lighter and thinner than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact. Xperia XZ2 Compact features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel amount per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a lot better 19 mega pixels resolution back camera and a larger camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10e has a little better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.