Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, having a 90.8 score against 79. The Galaxy S20 FE construction is extremely newer and incredibly thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it's also somewhat heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit superior processor than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S20 FE features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 57 percent larger battery capacity.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a way smaller sensor which offers a lot lower photo and video quality and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.