Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's general score of 79. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is newer and way thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is much heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 8 GB more RAM. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a bit worse screen density, a way smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a lot better camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.