Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 general score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer and a lot thinner, but much heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a slightly better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a little higher pixels density, a lot larger screen, much more screen brightness and a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 400 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 74 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a larger camera aperture, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.