Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-05 | -- |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's general score of 79. The Samsung Galaxy S25 body is a lot lighter and noticeably thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S25 features a little more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen, a lot brighter screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 400 GB.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 has a superior camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back camera with way more megapixels, a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations and a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.