Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, having an 88.5 score against 79. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is just a little heavier than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's extremely thinner and newer. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more powerful processing unit than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Z Flip features more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.