Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a global score of 85.6 against 79. Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a incredibly newer and notably thinner cellphone than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, although it is a little bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has the older 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display density.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 400 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit longer battery life than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.