Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, having a general score of 92.3 against 79. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is notably newer and a lot thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's, although it is also a little heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the older 11 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Xperia XZ2 Compact takes slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 19 megapixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 15% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.