Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's global score of 79. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is newer and much thinner, but also incredibly heavier than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has older 11 version while Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a much lower image and video quality and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.