Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-05 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a general score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's 79 overall score. These phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is newer and much thinner than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is heavier.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has just a little better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with much more brightness and a little bit better pixels density.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a way better 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.