Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-04-05 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting an 83.8 score against 79. Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s and Xperia XZ2 Compact were released only a couple of months apart, Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's construction is somewhat heavier but thinner. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2160 resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a little better number of pixels in each inch of display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a better memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a bit better performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh. Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with better video frame rate, a lot higher 19 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.