Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-08-10 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, having an 89 score against 79. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has an older 11 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 design is much newer and a lot thinner, but also heavier than Xperia XZ2 Compact.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a little bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a larger amount of RAM. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a lot higher video quality, a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB. Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 features a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.