Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is slightly better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, with an 81.6 score against 79. These phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has an older 10 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC design is much newer and notably thinner than Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it is way heavier.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel quantity in each inch of display and a way brighter display. Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit faster processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a superior camera than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot bigger sensor.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 400 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 5160mAh battery size against 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.