Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 483 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.67 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Compact is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a 79 score against 78.2. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia XZ2 Compact has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and better performance. Even though Xperia XZ2 Compact is noticeably older and way thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's body is still just a bit lighter.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has way darker display, a really smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per display inch. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a very superior battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2870mAh.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos or videos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.