Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-04-05 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 483 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.67 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's global score of 79. Both phones we are comparing work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner, but heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact has a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a slightly bigger memory for apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.