Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, with an 87.5 score against 82.2. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is notably newer, a lot thinner and incredibly lighter than Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a way better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a way better 2160 x 3840 resolution.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 400 GB. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.