Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-07-30 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Premium's 82.2 global score. The LG V30S ThinQ is a extremely thinner and a lot lighter phone than the Xperia XZ2 Premium, even though both of them were only released 5 months apart. The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a brighter display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840px and a greater pixel density.
LG V30S ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium has a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a better 19 megapixels resolution back camera and a lot bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V30S ThinQ is also cheaper than the other phone, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.