Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2018-07-30 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. Even being the best we are comparing, we must highlight that it's also way heavier and extremely thicker. Xperia XZ2 Premium and LG V35 ThinQ count with similar processing units, they have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Xperia XZ2 Premium has a more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a way better 2160 x 3840 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium captures clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a more megapixels camera in the back.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
Although Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.