Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than Xperia XZ2 Premium, with a general score of 87.1 against 82.2. The LG Velvet is a newer phone, and it is also noticeably lighter and extremely thinner than Xperia XZ2 Premium. Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit better processor than LG Velvet. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a way better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher screen pixel density and a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels. The LG Velvet has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory.
LG Velvet has superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The LG Velvet features just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a lot better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.