Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a global score of 82.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, we must note that it's also notably older, noticeably heavier and a lot thicker. Xperia XZ2 Premium has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has way more opaque display and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater screen density and a way better resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes better photographs and videos than Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with longer battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.