Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 760 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Xperia XZ2 Premium's 82.2 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is notably newer, notably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xperia XZ2 Premium. The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has much darker screen and a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and a lot better pixels count per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger storage for apps and games than Xperia XZ2 Premium, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 27 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.