Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-30 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.32 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 760 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a score of 82.2, which is slightly better than Moto G 5G's 81.5 overall score. Despite being the best in this review, the Xperia XZ2 Premium is a older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker device than the Moto G 5G. Xperia XZ2 Premium features a bit better CPU than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much sharper display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per screen inch and a lot higher 2160 x 3840px resolution. Moto G 5G features just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G 5G also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has more memory to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 41% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.